Learn to Prioritize the Risks that affect the Business the Most!

When you are limited to five comments, you need more than a list of problematic clauses. You need a defensible hierarchy for deciding which risks deserve priority.

The framework starts with five questions. Does the provision threaten the vendor’s core intellectual property? Does it create open-ended liability or a backdoor around the liability cap? Does it undermine the committed revenue and commercial assumptions behind the deal? Does it allow the customer to use the SaaS beyond the subscription rights and pricing model? And does it require something that conflicts with the operational reality of the platform?

These questions create a practical framework: protect the asset, protect the downside, protect the revenue model, protect the subscription model and reflect how the SaaS actually operates.

Other provisions may still matter. But the purpose of the exercise is to distinguish between a clause that is uncomfortable and a risk the business cannot afford to leave untouched.

The key is understanding not only what the clause says, but its legal, commercial, financial and technological consequences. That is what allows you to explain your priorities clearly and stand behind your recommendations.

* If you missed the 1st part of this 3-part training series - click here to watch.

Follow me on LinkedIn or join my newsletter to get updated on the next video in the series, dropping soon. 🚀